Monica MANOLESCU-OANCEA
"A
History of Genres" (LV20AM11)
Corrigé
du DST du 17 octobre 2012, analyse du
passage tiré de Dr. Jekyll
and Mr. Hyde
de R. L. Stevenson |
Ralph Blakelock - Moonlight (1885) Oil on canvas, 69.2
x 82.0 cm |
This excerpt from
the novella Dr. Jekyll and
Mr. Hyde deals with Dr. Jekyll’s first encounter with Mr. Hyde.
At the end of a
scientific experiment, Jekyll has obtained a potion that
transforms him into
somebody else, endowing him with a new body, a new mind, a new
name, and new
freedom, not experienced before, since Hyde is allowed to
transgress social
conventions of respectability. This change of identity and
physical appearance
is explored in the passage under scrutiny, with gothic
undertones. In its
extended meaning, gothic fiction refers to certain macabre,
morbid or dark
phenomena that arouse terror or horror. Here, Dr. Jekyll
attempts to
investigate the human mind by focusing on himself, more
precisely on what he
calls the “evil side of my nature”. The passage focuses on the
double or alter
ego of Dr. Jekyll both from a descriptive and a philosophical
point of view,
allowing the narrator to move from his own individual case to
the formulation
of a general statement about human nature (“all human beings are
commingled out
of good and evil”).
The
narrative. We are dealing with a first person
narrative through the voice of Dr. Jekyll himself, who is both
narrator and
protagonist. As an autodiegetic narrative, his story is
characterized by
subjectivity, by a deeply personal perspective on a totally new
event/person:
Jekyll’s discovery of the incarnation of his evil side reflected
in a mirror.
The narrative captures his sense of wonder and the shock at the
contemplation
of his other self, whom he had never seen before. The narrative
combines an
internal and an external perspective. It offers both a
description marked by
observation, the recording of details (Hyde’s ugliness) and an
introspection of
Jekyll’s own feelings and sensations while he is contemplating
Hyde. This
combination of internal and external perspectives is due to the
fact that Dr. Jekyll
is both the object and the subject of his experiment (in other
words he is
experimenting on himself while also being the scientist
conducting the
experiment). The passage also offers a lucid evaluation of the
implications
that the embodiment of evil in the person of Mr. Hyde might have
for his own
understanding of human nature.
How
do Jekyll and Hyde
complete each other? What does that tell Jekyll about human
nature?
Although Jekyll and
Hyde might look like they
are complementary, things are not as simple. A superficial
examination might
lead one to conclude that Jekyll is purely good and Hyde is bad,
but such a
conclusion is wrong. Jekyll has led a life made of nine tenths
effort and
control, but he is far from being purely good. Jekyll is
actually a combination
of good and bad, dominating his passions and impulses in a way
that conforms to
the social ideal of virtue. Hyde is part of Jekyll, which means
that Hyde has
“hidden” inside him all along (the homonymy between Hyde and “to
hide” is quite
obvious). The text advances a theory of the human mind that
talks both about
duality (good and bad) and the combination of extremes
(“commingling”). What
Jekyll claims is that moral and psychological polarities do not
actually exist
in pure form, they are rather mixed up in shades that live in
the minds of
individual persons. What Jekyll’s experiment achieves is a
separation of these
two moral and psychological states: thus, evil is incarnated in
Hyde.
By establishing a
correspondence between evil
and ugliness (Hyde is regarded with disgust by the people who
come in contact
with him), between goodness and beauty/attractiveness, the text
builds upon the
traditional parallel between body and soul: moral traits are
supposedly
inscribed in the body and can be read on a person’s face. We can
infer that
criminality is written on Hyde’s face, which makes people
shudder. Such
theories of correspondence body-soul, which imply a criminal
determinism, were
very popular in the 19th century, but have since been
rejected by
science and psychology.
What is extremely
interesting to notice in the
text is that Jekyll himself is not repelled by Hyde, but rather
recognizes and
welcomes him as part of himself. Hyde looks strangely familiar
to him in an
uncanny way. Moreover, it is not clear at this point whether he
will be able to
go back to his Jekyll shape again. Even more, Jekyll confesses a
fascination
with Hyde as his evil other that is not in keeping with the
ideal of decency
and virtue he has obeyed so far. This fascination with what he
calls “evil” is
simply a recognition of the darkness within, what later will be
called the unconscious
by Sigmund Freud.
Science
and magic.
The passage
combines elements of science and
magic, and it is impossible to tell them apart. Gothic fiction
sometimes relies
on a scientific framework, with the scientific details remaining
extremely
vague (Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
is
another example). Here, Jekyll is a doctor who experiments with
a magic potion
in his cabinet, which is a version of the scientific laboratory.
The word
“potion” reminds one of magic and witchcraft (also possibly of
alchemy), but
the secret of the potion is kept intact. The reader is not told
what the
ingredients of the potion are, how it is obtained etc. Only its
result is
described: the birth of Hyde out of Jekyll (accompanied by the
replacement of
Jekyll by Hyde). The potion acts both upon the body and the
soul: Jekyll
changes into another person, with a distinct set of values,
impulses and a
different body. Such a radical transformation has all the
attributes of magic,
although it happens in a medical context. Jekyll is a doctor,
but comes close
to a magician or an alchemist.
©2008-2012 Monica Manolescu-Oancea. Dernière
mise à jour : 9 novembre 2012.